misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Delay in recording confessional statement might not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal towards the deceased was caused with the petitioner but in support of opinion from the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is out there about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police will not be binding over the Court.
Note: Please fill any industry and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave discipline blank.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Reasonable grounds can be found to the record to attach the petitioner with the commission with the alleged offence. However punishment from the alleged offence does not tumble inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still realized Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit on the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of your petitioner falls while in the exception where bail cannot be granted even from the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
Let’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in making use of the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases listened to in the state court, in the same level.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after because of process of regulation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct just isn't enough however the order must read more show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful manner. Read more
acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
10. Without touching the merits on the case of the issue of yearly increases from the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, this sort of annual increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This section specifically relates to civil servants who are rendered surplus as a result of reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be issue to the provisions from the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the utilizing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Read more